Download White Paper: Lean System Design
Who Can Use Lean
“I thought Lean was only for Manufacturing.” If I had a dollar for every time I heard this statement… I would have, well, a few thousand dollars. Yes, Lean was created by a company whose ‘operations’ were manufacturing (Toyota). However, in the last 30 years, it has been readily adopted by organizations with ‘operations’ that are not manufacturing. Lean is used to streamline operations in financial services, the military, healthcare, construction, retail, professional services, distribution – and more. You cannot find a major bank or any hospital not using Lean.
Who can use Lean? Anyone and everyone. Any company that has a process to fulfill customer demand can use Lean. This includes real estate, hospitality, technology, lawyers, accountants, retailers/etailers, logistics, psychological testing, home services, construction, banks, insurance, hospitals, distributors, government, and yes; it still works in manufacturing.
What is Lean?
Lean is a philosophy of continuous improvement that can be captured in three succinct definitions.
- A set of tools that help identify and eliminate non-value-added work
- A deep and profound respect for the people that do the work
- Swift and even flow
Identify and Eliminate Non-Value-Added Work
Identifying and eliminating non-value-added work is the ‘nuts and bolts’ of Lean – the tools many Lean practitioners use, such as 5S, quick changeover, kanban, flow manufacturing, value stream mapping, and more. We can also add the visually oriented Six Sigma tools such as fishbone diagrams, Pareto analysis, and scatter plots. When implementing Lean in a Kaizen event or Lean Six Sigma project format, you are doing this. We use these Lean tools to fix the leaking of profits in your company and processes.

Non-Value-Added Work in Processes Creates Profit Leakage in your Business
A Deep & Profound Respect for the People who do the Work
Having a profound respect for the people who do the work is the soul of Lean and differentiates Lean from other business methods such as Six Sigma. Lean companies and Lean practitioners always involve the people who do the work when improving an area or process. Lean people think about how to support those who do the work. This can be making tools, information, and materials more convenient to retrieve or mistake-proof a complex operation, making it easy to do correctly.
It may be helpful to think of the opposite of Lean when thinking of a non-Lean approach; management or professionals in the company develop and implement an improvement without much notification or input from the people using the ‘improvement.’ It could be a consultant using lots of data and interviews with executives to develop a solution in isolation. When we get asked to ‘do’ Lean without involving the people who do the work, we tell them that it cannot be done. It is an oxymoron.

Being Lean Means Having a Deep & Profound Respect for the People Who Do the Work
Swift & Even Flow
Creating swift and even flow is the goal of Lean System Design. In many companies customers don’t order from a company consistently or predictably. Demand has peaks and valleys and is often seasonal. Given the variation of demand and supplier deliveries, a Lean company still strives to deliver its product or service fast and consistently. We developed a Lean System Design and the pillars of this strategic approach to Lean to achieve a swift and even flow.

An Everyday Example of ‘Swift & Even Flow’ is a Traffic Roundabout
Ways to ‘Do’ Lean
Toyota first developed Lean in the 1950s as a production system. Over the years, it has thrived (versus other business improvement methods) because practitioners have developed models to adopt Lean to their industry, company, people, and processes. Lean System Design is one of these new models. Some of the well-known ways to implement Lean are:
- Two-Second Lean
- Kaizen (Rapid Improvement) Events
- Lean Six Sigma Projects
Two-Second Lean
The Two-Second Lean model is an employee engagement model that uses the tools of Lean to get your entire company involved in continuous improvement. This method gives people time to make improvements every day, takes advantage of the prevalence of smartphones to take videos of these improvements, and celebrates advances every day as a team. It is the most hands-on, employee-engagement way to implement Lean. It puts the responsibility on every person in your organization to make lots and lots of minor improvements. Save a few seconds… great. There is no need for groundbreaking change; just use your brains to improve every day.
The challenge is that this is an all-or-nothing approach to Lean. The company must follow the formula daily; if not, it is nearly impossible for the Two-Second Lean approach to work. Of course, many Lean Practitioners would say that about Lean, no matter how it is done.
Kaizen Events
Kaizen events are a way of implementing Lean in a very focused one-week or shorter duration. The Lean or Kaizen team starts on the problem or focal area Monday morning and wrap up the implementation by Friday lunchtime. While the focus of a Kaizen event is the activities done in the week (but can also be done in two-, three-, and four-day durations), a few weeks of planning often precede the event to ensure all of the required data has been captured. One of the keys to a Kaizen event’s success is planning done in the weeks before the event.
Companies use Kaizen events for a few reasons. If the scope of the problem or area is small, it is a way to implement Lean quickly, eliminating unnecessary gaps when work on the area or the issue needs to be done. Many organizations use it because it gets everyone working on only the focal area or problem. Otherwise, the day-to-day activities of running the business would be the priority.
Like Lean Six Sigma, discussed below, Kaizen Events are based on understanding the current state, identifying non-value-added work, creating ways to eliminate it, and then developing the future state.
Lean Six Sigma Projects
When the scope of the improvement area or problem 1) crosses multiple departments, 2) the solutions need to be tested and validated, or 3) the data required cannot be defined upfront, the Lean Six Sigma project format can be the best way to deploy Lean. This approach is more systematic than Kaizen Events and follows the DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control) model from Six Sigma. Lean Six Sigma is different from Six Sigma, with its more quantitative approach, but we have found the DMAIC steps to be a checklist to ensure the improvement is robust and sustainable.
- Define: Define the problem, usually via a problem statement. This step also clearly defines the scope of the process or work area included in the project.
- Measure: Measure is more than numbers. It includes gathering any data needed to solve the problem or streamline the process. This can be a process flow map, interviews with subject matter experts, time studies, spaghetti maps, or numerical data gathering.
- Analyze: Analyze in Lean Six Sigma involves looking at the data to identify non-value-added work. At Supply Velocity, we often color code process flow maps or time study steps green for value added to the customer, yellow for non-value added but necessary, or red for non-value-added and should be eliminated. It can also include doing velocity analysis using Pareto charts or prioritizing potential causes for poor performance using a fishbone diagram.
- Improve: Improve is when improvement ideas are generated to eliminate the non-value-added steps. We often prioritize these ideas into ‘do-now,’ ‘do-next’ and ‘do-later’. The ‘do-now’ ideas provide a fast return on investment. The ‘do-next’ ideas require additional thinking, development, or expenditure. The ‘do-later’ ideas need to be evaluated to ensure they provide a return and may be discarded.
- Control: Control ensures the improvement is sustainable. This may be based on 5S audits, developing standard operating procedures (SOPs), or creating performance scorecards for the work area that track key performance measures impacted by the improvement.
Lean System Design
Lean System Design creates the framework for all parts of the company to work together to deliver on your strategy. Who has visibility of all the parts? The executives: the CEO, President and COO. This is why Lean System Design is a strategic model – it belongs in the ‘hands’ of the people who can look across all functional areas.
Within the six pillars of Lean System Design are tools and techniques borrowed from Lean Process Improvement, Supply Chain Management, Planning, and Analytics. These tools give executives something ‘concrete’ to use to improve critical business processes. However, it is the interconnectedness of the pillars makes Lean System Design work. Robust planning well leads to excellent sourcing. Great sourcing leads to great operations. Great planning, sourcing, and operations lead to effective storage. Great storage leads to excellent service and product delivery, and when needed, the return process is planned and streamlined for the company and customers.
What is the result of a Lean System? A Swift and even Flow of your products and services to your customers.
The job of the CEO in a Lean System
Too often, CEOs are asked to ‘create a Lean culture.’ People who deal with culture know that Lean can only flourish in a culture when it becomes part of it. But making your culture ‘Lean’ will never work. This happens over time when you have a Lean System, with strategy deployment and an implementation plan focused on leveraging your people. The CEO is the chief executive of the Lean System.
The Six Pillars of a Lean System
- Plan: processes that balance supply and demand to develop a course of action that best meets supply and demand
- Source: processes that acquire labor, material, equipment, information, and services, and the management of those suppliers to meet customer demand
- Make: processes that transform information and materials into products and services.
- Store: processes that buffer resources and capacity and prepare for disruption to ensure the supply of products and services to customers
- Deliver: processes that provide goods, services, and information to customers.
- Return: processes associated with receiving returned products or recovering from a service failure
Plan
- Demand Forecasting
- Capacity – understand bottlenecks (Theory of Constraints)
- Sales & Operations Planning
Planning starts with a forecast. I once had a Client tell me that forecasting is the other ‘F’ word in business. Get finance, operations/supply chain, and sales/marketing people in a room and ask how the forecast works and you will get an immediate argument. Finance doesn’t understand why forecasts don’t align with budgets. Operations doesn’t understand why Sales cannot provide an accurate forecast. Sales are tired of hearing everyone complain, so they most likely stop providing a forecast or base it on the sales budget (which is not a forecast).
Forecasting demand is critical. Forecasts provide visibility into future demand for planning resources (labor, inventory, information systems, equipment). It is the first pillar of Lean System Design because without a view of potential future demand, the rest of your system based on disparate guesses. When all you are doing is guessing, you cannot Deliver your product or service to your customer quickly and efficiently.
If we begin developing a demand forecast with the understanding that there is no such thing as a consistently accurate forecast, we can make progress. Forecasting is inherently inaccurate. Few people (or no one) can predict the future. The best example of businesses seeing into the future happens in the Finance industry. However, traders making prescient trades one year often make the worst in the following years. Instead of asking for an accurate forecast, the better way to think about improving forecasting is to reduce forecast error or the difference between the forecast and the actual demand. If the forecast for an item is 125 but the actual demand is 100, the forecast error is 25%. There is a positive bias if the forecast is consistently higher than the actual demand.
The best way to forecast is to start with a statistical model using historical data for each product or service. This can be as simple as a trailing three-month average or more sophisticated exponential smoothing models that use optimization to minimize forecast error for each item. It is essential to note that the forecast is in units, not a dollar forecast. Connecting the item forecast to budgets is done later in the process. For an effective system, it is crucial to understand the forecast in units. This statistical or algorithmic forecast is then handed off to the sales team to validate and use as a tool to talk to customers about their demand plans. The sales team makes adjustments, and these are uploaded to the ERP as the final product or service (unit) forecast.
The next step in planning is to understand your capacity. This is measured where a constraint prevents you from fulfilling customer demand. Constraints are often specific skilled labor, such as programmers, specialized capital equipment, warehouse space, or constraints in the supply chain at critical suppliers. To use capacity in your planning, it must be unitized, requiring a standardization of the unit of measure. Some product families can be based on weight (grams, KG, pounds), others on liquid volume (gallons), and others on ‘eaches’ or cases.
The highest level of planning is implementing Sales and operations Planning (S&OP). Note that this planning method has other names such as Sales, Inventory & Operations Planning (SIOP), and Integrated Business Planning (IBP). For a complete understanding of S&OP, see our whitepaper (https://www.supplyvelocity.com/the-benefits-of-sales-operations-planning-sop/) and S&OP service summary (https://www.supplyvelocity.com/services/sales-and-operations-planning/).

The S&OP Monthly Process
Source
Sourcing is strongly associated with purchasing physical goods, but all companies must source and procure equipment, talent (recruiting firms and staffing agencies), software, and services. Many companies in the service sector give sourcing little effort or attention. Still, supply chain management applies to managing suppliers of all kinds and can yield a competitive advantage.
The level of trust you put in your supplier is at the heart of your sourcing strategy. Below is a hierarchy of trust from highest to lowest.
Equity Investment: When a company makes an equity investment in its supplier, it expects both financial gains and a reduction in the cost of doing business. This cost is based on the theory of Transaction Cost Economics. Oliver Williamson won the Nobel Prize in Economics by realizing that every transaction has a cost, but when people are in the same firm or share ownership, that cost is reduced. Equity ownership should align two firms and lower transaction costs.
Business Process Outsourcing: When I talk about outsourcing, I mean working with a supplier who is responsible for part of your cash flow or who is the last company to touch a product or service before it goes to your customer. This requires a high level of trust and is often codified in service-level agreements that contractually set supplier and customer expectations.
Platform Participant: Many of us participate in software platforms and may not realize it. ERP, CRM, WMS, and many other types of software create communities of users. Platform participants attend regional, national, and global user conferences. They get involved in product development and provide product testing to be able to see features early and influence features that are offered. In many cases, competitors who use the same software will set aside their competitive instincts to support the software platform they all use. Becoming a part of their platform creates a high-level trust-sharing relationship with your supplier. It is difficult to switch software platforms, but even harder to lose your community.
Preferred Supplier: Many companies create preferred supplier relationships with their 80/20 suppliers, or the 20% of suppliers responsible for 80% of the total spend. Preferred suppliers will be involved in collaborative planning, forecasting, and replenishment or CPFR to ensure alignment and availability of products or services. They also get involved in joint product development, where the supplier will develop modules of a product or service that integrate with their customer’s new offering.
All four levels of trust create a requirement of trustworthiness. Many suppliers also sell to your competitors, and creating a partnership requires the supplier to maintain confidentiality of business plans, forecasts, and new product development initiatives.
Transactional Supplier: The last level of trust is a transactional supplier. These 20/80 suppliers, or 80% of suppliers, are responsible for only 20% of your total spend. The vital aspect of managing these suppliers is that it is OK to have an ‘arms-length’ relationship with them. You do not have to have partnerships with every supplier. Most of your suppliers are not that important to you, and you are not that important to them. Contracts are not necessarily needed; you don’t need to invest much in these relationships. However, if this is how you manage all your supplier relationships, you can improve your company’s performance by working with the right partners.
Make
Make is part of your business that transforms materials and information into products or services. This is where the traditional tools of Lean are used. These tools can be categorized as:
- Mistake-proofing
- Visual Workplace
- Visual mapping
Mistake-proofing reduces, prevents, or eliminates the possibility of making an error. I also like to think of it as making it difficult to do work the wrong way (or easy to do it the correct way). This can be done with tooling that only allows parts to be put into machines the correct way, a visual workplace that makes it easy to see how to do work correctly, or the use of sensors that prevent incorrect processing. Many kinds of software are a type of mistake-proofing by preventing illogical data from going through the process.

A ‘Low-Tech’ Mistake-Proofing Example
A visual workplace is based on 5S Visual Management, a five-step process for organizing and standardizing the workplace by increasing visibility. It is clutter-free and clean, makes it easy to see where things are below, has visual standards (such as housekeeping), and is sustained. Below is an example of a visual poster to keep the warehouse organized. Another example of a visual workplace is having good aisle signage (for a warehouse) so people can quickly identify where items are stored.

A Good Example of a Visual Warehouse with Clear Aisle Signs
Visual mapping has many forms. It can be a Value Stream Map, a Process Flow Map, or a Spaghetti Diagram. Visual mapping helps people see the process and the non-value-added work. In the Process Flow Map below, the team identified any process step with a red dot as non-value-added and should be eliminated. In the Spaghetti Map, we can see that the warehouse employee is walking around the entire warehouse to pick up the items for an order. The work to pick an order can be significantly reduced if the racking was laid out better and the items placed in the racks based on velocity. This impacts labor productivity and how quickly this company can respond to customer demand. Using a spaghetti map helps employees in the warehouse or factory see how much they are moving, which helps generate ideas for improvements and makes the case for improving the layout. Visual mapping is part of successful change management for a Lean project.

Process Flow Map with Each Step Coded as Green, Yellow or Red

Spaghetti Map of Warehouse Order Picking Shows Excessive Movement
Store
Storage was created to represent warehousing and inventory. However, the concept is much greater and applies to all businesses, including those without inventory. Storage means to prepare. This can be preparation for demand spikes or disruption. It can take the form of optimizing inventory to fulfill customer orders or labor planning. Labor and inventory are two resources that companies need to fulfill customer demand. Inventory storage is straightforward and based on math and warehousing operations. Labor storage is more challenging, however, it can also be ‘stored’.
Every organization has had times when demand surged and sagged. During surges, you need tactics to achieve swift still flow. During sagging demand, you need tactics to hold onto your skilled labor, including hourly warehouse workers, manufacturing operators, and data scientists or consultants. Some tactics for storing labor include:
- Using temporary staffing agencies.
- Having a ‘bench’ of contractors that are skilled and more expensive than employees but have no fixed cost.
- Asking retirees to come back on a part-time basis, as needed.
- Use work-from-home part-timers willing to flex up in hours per week, as needed.
- Having a list of value-added but non-urgent projects to work on during slower demand times.
- Offer salaried workers additional paid time off to compensate for unpaid overtime, but only if they use it during your slow season.
- Finding temporary workers who have other jobs during your slow season but are off during your busy season. My example comes from a moving company that hires teachers to become logisticians for the busy summer moving season. The teachers are smart and capable and are happy to earn a great wage when they are off for summer break.
This is only a small list of possibilities, and many may not apply to your business. However, you need some way to store labor in preparation for surging and sagging demand.
Deliver
Most business people associate delivery with delivering physical goods. It is this, but it is also much more. Delivery is how you get products and services, including customer information.
Physical products are delivered through different transportation modes, such as ships, barges, trucks, and vans. Newer methods include gig-worker delivery using people’s cars, airborne drones, and delivery robots.
Services and information are often delivered by email. This may or may not be the best method of sending information or your service to your customer. If you and your customer are communicating requirements, scope, or updates, that is delivery. Email may be a great tool, or it may be problematic, mistake-prone, and burdensome.
In addition, delivery is often an afterthought unless you are a transportation company. Most businesses forget that delivery is the last thing that happens before your customer sees, touches, and uses your product or service. By thinking of Delivery as a pillar of a Lean System, you will design the delivery to be the best cost and most hassle-free way to get your customer information, products, and services.
Return
Return is often the pillar of Lean System Design that companies want to ignore. This is receiving a returned product or recovering from a service failure. You do not need physical products to design a robust return process. Service businesses also have ‘defects’ in their services that fail to meet customers’ expectations.
A physical return or a service failure creates a Cost of Poor Quality, or COPQ. This cost can take obvious forms or involve hidden processes that happen ‘below the water line’ of management. The best image to represent this is an iceberg. There are obvious costs, such as providing credit or shipping a new product, but the much greater and often unmeasured costs involve all the work dealing with the customer and the failure.
COPQ includes:
- Telling a customer to scrap the failed product and shipping a new one
- Creating a returned material authorization (RMA)
- Cost of shipping the returned product back to your facility
- Receiving, classifying, and storing returned products
- Determining how the failure occurred
- Determining how to reuse the returned product can involve engineering, operations, supply chain, etc.
- Providing credit to the customer
- Redoing the service
- Losing that customer forever
- Communication with the customer
- Low employee morale dealing with an unhappy customer

Many Costs of Poor Quality are ‘Below the Water Line’ and Not Obvious
We include ‘Return’ as a key pillar in Lean System Design because analysis of returns and service failures is the best way to ensure they don’t happen again. When a return or service failure occurs, we immediately (drop everything) have a root cause analysis meeting. This uses the Cause & Effect (or Fishbone) diagram to organize discussions of why the failure happened. This becomes action items that must be follow-up on to ensure we are making changes in the process that eliminate potential to make these mistakes again.
The return or service failure must also be categorized. A key to quality is taxonomy or the science of categorization. Each defect is assigned to a category. As you gather data, the number and impact of the defect categories, put into a Pareto chart will lead you to focus on changes in your process to create continuous improvement in quality.

Cause & Effect (Fishbone) Diagram Helps Categorize Potential Root Causes

Pareto Charts Help Prioritize the Vital Few from the Useful Many
Who Can Use Lean System Design and Why?
I hope that by now, you can see how every type of organization can and should create Lean System. It doesn’t matter if your business is based on services, finance, healthcare, hospitality, construction, distribution, or manufacturing; if you fulfill customer demand, you want swift and even flow.
More than simply being able to use Lean, the framework of Lean System Design allows for new synergies across the organization. Quality problems hurt future sales but may go unnoticed. A forecast with poor accuracy may lead to the wrong inventory and not having enough space in the warehouse. Creating a culture which enables swift and even flow across your entire business and critical process is not easy.You must adopt Lean, and implement the tools discussed within all 6 pillars. Lean System Design is a ‘system’ approach to improving process and performance which is unparalleled for aligning everyone from operator to CEO to ‘Delivering great things to customers’.
For more information, email mitch@supplyvelocity.com.
Ask us your Lean, Six Sigma, or Supply Chain question.
We’re the experts! We’ll get back within 48 hrs. with a valuable response.
"*" indicates required fields
“The role of the Erie Insurance Marketing Department has been evolving over the past several years – from a support role to a more critical role of driving growth in our organization. Because of our increased workload and desire to prioritize the most critical projects, we hired Supply Velocity to teach us the skills of Lean Six Sigma.Participants included the Promotions, Market Research and Agency Licensing sections of the Marketing Department.
We learned valuable tools to help us to prioritize based on the voice of the customer.
I firmly believe these skills made a difference in how we work every day. We are moving new projects forward, eliminating or changing ineffective processes, and we are a much stronger department. We continue to use the tools to help us with our highly-complex and time-consuming projects. Supply Velocity helped us to accomplish our goals.”
“Myerson engaged Supply Velocity, specifically Ray Davis to visit our plant in Trinidad to conduct a two day assessment of our production procedures and provide us feedback on areas for improvement and where applicable, areas for future analysis.Put simply, we got everything we paid for and in addition to more in depth analysis, we got specific tasks that were immediately actionable. Our local management team found Ray to be engaging, highly credible and insightful based on his wide experience. In other words the cultural differences and lack of specific industry knowledge weren’t impediments to things we could implement immediately and on our own. In a nutshell it was money well spent and will pay itself back many times over.”
“Supply Velocity has helped Clean succeed in a number of ways. First, they provided the education that kicked off our Lean Process Improvement journey. They also facilitated a number of large supply chain and process improvement projects including: 1) building quality into our direct-labor productivity incentive program, 2) designing the layout of our garment warehouse, and 3) streamlining our route service process.We have integrated the methods that Supply Velocity taught us into our management and strategic planning. In the process our quality measurement has improved 22% from 2013 to 2015, we have reduced required annual labor by 2200 hours from the garment facility layout project and we’ve seen 50% decrease in error rate. Obviously the numbers speak for themselves, but just as important, Supply Velocity has been fun to work and have become true partners. They have “taught us how to fish” so our internal teams are able to implement change on their own, with the skills we learned from Supply Velocity. This relationship has been invaluable.”
“We engaged with Supply Velocity to help us embed process improvement at all levels of the business. Our team learned from Mitch to let the data drive decisions, to use Lean tools to help us see our processes critically and objectively, and to create a control plan to manage all of the tasks that were the outcome of the data study.The project turned out to be very significant to the company and most importantly, our customers. We reduced our customer wait times by 40%, and cut in half the labor cost to fulfill customer orders.
Some results are not able to be measured. However, as a result of this project, we have started to build a Lean mindset and culture, which is part of our strategic mission to save our customers money. Supply Velocity has been a valued partner in this mission.”
“We are pleased that Essex selected Supply Velocity, Inc. as our Lean Implementation Partner. At one facility, we have saved over $350,000 in work-in-process inventory, reduced throughput time from 2 weeks to minutes and increased inventory turns 3 to 8 times per year. All these results are in just 6 months. Our return of investment is very high.”
“In 2015 we began working with Dr. Mitch Millstein to optimize our inventory locations supporting e-commerce and in-store inventory needs. From this work we developed a new omni-channel warehousing and inventory plan that entirely redefined our approach to warehousing, inventory management, store distribution and fulfillment. As a result of the analyses by Dr. Millstein we have begun the move to an improved omni-channel design by reassigning MSAs to new warehouses, greater leveraging of in-store inventories to satisfy e-commerce demands, and exploring acquisitions of new warehousing space in strategic locations. We have already seen an improvement of $300,000 from both more efficient shipping strategies due to better inventory management.”
“Mitch Millstein and his team helped guide our shop fabrication division in the re-layout of our custom pipe and steel fabrication facility when we moved into a new building. It is not only the results but how he helped. We were involved in every step. I personally did time studies and was able to see the non-value added steps required to manufacture in our old layout. When we created our new layout, everyone was involved, from the executive team to our direct labor force. With Mitch’s help we increased our throughput by a 3x multiple, while providing more competitive prices to our clients as a result of the efficiency improvements.This has enabled us to not only make more money but also to expand our commercial reach and serve more, and larger customers. I would recommend Supply Velocity to any company that wants to make improvement in supply chain and operations.”
“Many thanks to all three Supply Velocity presenters. I think you guys took a very difficult time for learning and capitalized on everyone’s time and training needs. I truly hope this helps your business as this was a considerable undertaking on the part of Supply Velocity. Outstanding!!”
“Supply Velocity created visibility within our Assurance Services Group… visibility of performance, Client-service, employee satisfaction and processing time. Using the Supply Velocity System, Audit Report Cycle time is down over 50%. We are using his strategies to create greater Client loyalty.”
“Isolating a problem, finding short, and long term solutions with measurable results is what was promised and results is what was delivered by Supply Velocity. Upon launch of the Lean Six Sigma Selling System, we knew more about our customers, our products, and were able to create a solid plan to increase sales of our most profitable products. Within months of implementation, our booked sales jumped 60% and our most valued customers were getting direct, active, and calculable attention.”
“Your process encourages this group to work together, better communicate and have fun doing it.”
“C&R was struggling with labor productivity. The construction crews were often missing materials that they needed to do their work. This caused significant idle time. Supply Velocity, Inc. and C&R used value stream mapping and visual management tools to make dramatic improvements in operations. Most importantly, two years later C&R is sustaining and improving on the implementation. C&R’s return on investment was 11:1. C&R had a record year last year in both sales and profits and would not have been able to pull it off without the changes Supply Velocity, Inc. helped us make.”
“Supply Velocity has provided the technical expertise and political capital to move our project forward. They have just the right amount of push and the right amount of support. Supply Velocity has helped us make real changes to improve efficiencies in logistics without jeopardizing our performance. We’re happy and our customers are happy.”
“Closure Medical recently completed a major reorganization in order to enhance our ability to rapidly create innovative medical devices. We hired Supply Velocity to help us map out the process and service flows of the new organization that would maximize our product development process (PDP). In four weeks, Supply Velocity helped us envision a new PDP structure, develop measures and accountability for each step, and gain consensus within the organization. Supply Velocity’s focus on speed and accountability helped us complete a critical project in a timely fashion.”
“Supply Velocity’s Lean Six Sigma System has given us new tools to help improve our sales performance. We have learned new ways to analyze our business which makes problem solving more accurate and has made us better leaders.”
“Anheuser-Busch Precision Printing had been implementing Lean Operations on our own for the past two years. We needed to move faster and partnered with Supply Velocity, Inc. Through Supply Velocity, Inc.’s mathematical workflow balancing and visual management tools, dramatic improvements were achieved. The entire converting operation was rearranged based on Lean principles. The result is a 20.6% productivity improvement, enabling us to operate with 23 fewer people in production.”
“In thirty years of hiring consultants, Supply Velocity, Inc. was the first to tell me what they were going to do, set a price they stuck to and substantially exceed my expectations. I have recommended them to friends and acquaintances. They were true partners in assisting with the turnaround of an acquisition we had been struggling with for two years.Their math-based technology, solid down-to-earth facilitation skills, and positive, patient and enthusiastic attitude combined to make our implementation of Lean a very rewarding experience.
We increased our production by 50% in the first month of implementation and continue to see improvements. Improvements have not only been realized in productivity, but also in quality and morale. We have increased profitability by $2M on flat sales of $10M.
Based on Supply Velocity, Inc.’s integrity and our results, I will continue to refer them to others and utilize them in the future as we expand our company through acquisitions.”
“Our experience with Supply Velocity was one of the best values we have ever had from a consulting project. Cyril Narishkin brought a structured lean methodology, invaluable experience and engaging facilitation skills to help us streamline a very complex and disjointed sales order process. Just as importantly, our team now has the knowledge and process competencies to address other business improvement opportunities going forward.”
“We used Supply Velocity on our Warehouse optimization project. One of the key characteristics of Supply Velocity is that they listened to our requirements and provided a clear path for our Warehouse processes using lean tools and our future sales growth as objectives.”
“We used Supply Velocity to rethink our sales process. By analyzing the entire process we found wasted time in our Sales, Admin and Operations departments. Streamlining this process created extra time for each Sales Rep, allowing them to spend more time with Customers and increase the value we add. Gross profit margins are up 40%!We are now using Supply Velocity to help us rethink our entire Strategic Plan.”
“We are using Supply Velocity’s Lean Six Sigma methods to analyze a variety of processes including rationalizing SKUs (stock-keeping-units). By using math to evaluate SKUs we took some of the emotion out of our decisions. We expect significant increases in sales and productivity from reducing poor performing SKUs.”
“I am thrilled to provide this testimonial for Supply Velocity and their outstanding work in implementing Lean Warehouses and processes at Crescent Parts & Equipment through the COVID pandemic. With their data-first focus and Mitch’s exceptional coaching and experience, they transformed our business into a more supply chain-oriented organization, enabling us to grow while prioritizing employee safety and creating a better work environment. Supply Velocity’s expertise in Lean methodologies and their comprehensive evaluation of our customers have been instrumental in optimizing our operations and increasing customer satisfaction. We highly recommend Supply Velocity to any company seeking to implement Lean processes and enhance their supply chain efficiency.”
“In the spring of 2003, the St. Louis Area Chapter of the American Red Cross engaged Supply Velocity, Inc. to perform a study and make recommendations to streamline office processes, maximize cash flow in purchasing and warehousing and restructure and enhance our maintenance department. Supply Velocity, Inc.’s process was methodical, flexible, staff-oriented, inclusive and, above all, trackable.In the last six months, our Chapter has realized expense savings of over $380,000 annually, and significant improvement in intra-company service levels has been attained. Supply Velocity, Inc. will return to the Chapter periodically throughout the next 18 months to audit our newly implemented processes. We have been pleased with our results and Supply Velocity, Inc.’s professionalism.”
“Supply Velocity gave us the tools to analyze our business and processes based on the facts and numbers versus our perceptions. Our common quote was “Let the numbers lead us”. The key for our organization was how quickly we moved from classroom to actual project initiation. We were able to jump in, start using the tools and see a difference right away.
The get-into-action approach was good for our culture.”
“For several years we have worked with Supply Velocity to support us with their expertise on Lean Operations and Supply Chain Management. Supply Velocity has helped us implement Lean, improve our inventory systems, and educate our people. They are professionals who are always available to help us as needed.”
“In a time of volatile supply chain disruption, Supply Velocity is helping us develop Demand and Supply Planning processes to proactively tackle these new challenges. They are genuine partners, working with our team, facilitating and teaching.”
“Supply Velocity is driving instrumental change in our inventory management processes. This is critical for us to be competitive in a supply chain environment with numerous disruptions. They are making change happen, which can be challenging in a 182 year old organization.”